Език
English
РусскийStoyana Natseva
Research Scholar, 1Department of Psychology, Happy Life Academy,
Abstract: This paper looks at the relationship between coping strategies, existential crises, and attachment styles, highlighting
how these psychological components work together to influence how people react to emotional discomfort, meaning-related
issues, and identity-based uncertainties. Intense introspection about one’s direction, purpose, and sense of self are common
characteristics of existential crisis experiences, which are also often accompanied by elevated anxiety, emotional instability, and
a profound need for clarity. With secure attachment connected to better emotional control and insecure attachment linked to
increased existential sensitivity and anguish, attachment theory offers a crucial framework for comprehending why some people
are more susceptible to these experiences than others. These processes may either mitigate or exacerbate existential distress
depending on whether people use maladaptive coping mechanisms like avoidance and rumination or adaptive ones like
meaning-making, introspection, or social support. This study emphasizes the value of consistent relational patterns, cohesive
self-structures, and useful coping mechanisms in lowering existential vulnerability by combining current theoretical
advancements with empirical data. It also highlights important ramifications for therapeutic treatment and suggests exciting
avenues for additional study targeted at boosting psychological resilience and improving general wellbeing.
Keywords: Existential Crisis, Coping Strategies, value system, Attachment Styles, Psychological.
I. INTRODUCTIONS
Rapid social change, elevated performance expectations, and identity-related doubt have all contributed to a rise in the prevalence of
existential worries among young people in recent years. According to modern existentialists, an existential crisis is characterized by
profound emotional suffering brought on by questions of self-identity, meaning, purpose, and death (Van Bruggen et al., 2017; Vos,
2023). Many people have these crises in their early twenties, when they are still adjusting to adulthood and are more susceptible to
emotional and mental health issues. Modern mental health studies must prioritize studying existential anxiety because of recent
research showing a strong correlation between it and increased anxiety, sadness, and overall psychological suffering (Schnell,
2020).
Attachment theory offers a fundamental basis for comprehending why some persons have existential crises with more intensity than
others. Recent research indicates that attachment patterns, established in early caregiver-child connections, are major predictors of
emotional regulation, meaning-making ability, and resistance to existential risks (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2019; Jankowski &
Sandage, 2020). Research conducted over the last ten years demonstrates that insecure attachment, particularly anxious and avoidant
types, correlates with increased existential discomfort, diminished sense of purpose, and heightened existential isolation (Piispanen,
2020; Martin et al., 2023). Conversely, healthy connection promotes psychological stability, facilitates openness to existential
inquiry, and diminishes vulnerability to meaninglessness.
The association that exists between attachment patterns and existential discomfort is further mediated by coping methods. adaptive
coping techniques, which include proactive coping, meaning-making, and social support, have the potential to provide a buffer
against existential anxiety and enhance psychological well-being (Greenglass & Fiksenbaum, 2019; Park et al., 2023). On the other
hand, maladaptive techniques, including avoidance, repression, and rumination, greatly exacerbate the severity of an existential
crisis, especially in persons who have insecure attachment orientations (Chen et al., 2024; Lemay et al., 2023). It is crucial to
comprehend this triadic interplay between coping methods, attachment patterns, and existential crises in order to devise tailored
mental health therapies that increase resilience and encourage young people to construct meaningful narratives about themselves.
Recently, mental-health experts have stressed that existential discomfort is now a prevalent psychological experience across various
cultural and demographic groups. Digital communication, changing social roles, and uncertain economies have increased young
people’ fragmentation and internal turmoil. In a developmental period of transition and uncertainty, these variables make it harder
for them to form a cohesive self-narrative.
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRA)
Existential issues have started to connect more overtly with daily emotional functioning, affecting anxiety, relationships, and life
direction. This growing significance emphasizes the necessity to study existential crises as psychological states impacted by social
environment, developmental variables, and personality dynamics.
Existential anxiety interacts with identity formation, emotional regulation, and relationship expectancies, according to modern
theoretical frameworks. Emerging evidence shows that young people with unstable internal structures, such as insecure attachment,
inconsistent caregiving, or poor coping behaviors, are more likely to feel existential turmoil and self-doubt. External demands to
create goals, succeed, and improve may exacerbate these vulnerabilities, leading to feelings of inadequacy and emptiness. This
integrative lens helps scholars and clinicians see existential crisis as a multifaceted construct influenced by early relational
experiences, adaptive capacities, and sociocultural demands, emphasizing the need for comprehensive intervention and support
frameworks.
II. EXISTENTIAL CRISIS
An existential crisis, in layman’s words, is the emotional equivalent of an internal whirlwind of questions. Confidence crisis is the
overwhelming sense of uncertainty about your life’s purpose, identity, and direction. An existential crisis occurs when a person is
very confused about the meaning of their existence. Trying to put together a jigsaw puzzle without seeing the final product would be
akin to that. There may be times when you question your life’s meaning and the things you want to achieve. It entails fretting about
what’s to come rather than just living in the present now. As time goes on, you start to doubt that you will ever discover the answers
you want about the future, your life’s trajectory, and the remedies you’ve been seeking. You could even start to think about what
happens after this journey we call life ends. Existential crisis is most common among young individuals (18–30 years old).
This is because individuals in this age bracket are experiencing major life changes, including coming into their own as individuals,
figuring out their romantic relationships, and launching their professional lives. A lot of people ask them profound questions like
„What’s my life’s purpose?“ This crises, however, may affect people of any age. People in their 30s to 60s may also have them, but
it’s less common in this age group. Furthermore, even those who are 60 years old and above may still have thoughts of confusion
about the meaning of life as they contemplate aging and their achievements. (Steger, 2017) It follows that anybody, at any age, may
go through an existential crisis, albeit it disproportionately affects young individuals. As per the APA, „An „existential crisis“
describes a person’s interior struggle. Feelings of meaninglessness and a host of other unpleasant emotions such as worry, despair,
anxiety, and depression are hallmarks of this condition. A person is said to be experiencing an existential crisis if they are feeling
uneasy about their life’s purpose, freedom, and choices. Belief in the emptiness and meaninglessness of life is a typical outcome of
this existential dread.
„Existential crisis refers to a form of anxiety that arises from contemplating the fundamental aspects of human existence, such as
death, meaninglessness, freedom, and isolation,“ is the definition that was upheld in this study (Van Bruggen et al., 2017; Vos,
2023) regarding the conception of existential crisis. A profound apprehension or disquiet over the essence of being, the purpose of
living, and the finality of death. Rather of focusing on specific dangers, the existential crisis asks and seeks answers to larger issues
about the nature of life. (Vos, 2023; Van Bruggen et al., 2017)
Moreover, Van highlighted that worries or anxieties arising from basic threats to human life, including death, meaninglessness, and
intrinsic loneliness, are termed existential concerns (Van Bruggen et al., 2017). It is a notion that pertains to living as a whole and
beyond physical dangers. The core problem of inner conflict arises when individuals see that a feeling of meaninglessness obstructs
their pursuit of a meaningful existence. Individuals are concentrated on competing and achieving success in the contemporary,
rapid-paced milieu to conform to societal expectations. Individuals may get perplexed and inadvertently chase several ambitions
without comprehending their underlying aim. This engenders a detrimental loop of pursuing goals without attaining something that
satisfies one’s life purpose. This situation engenders several problems, especially for young people who often find themselves
ensnared in a loop and want to break free, perhaps leading to an existential crisis.
III. ATTACHMENT STYLES
Attachment style refers to an individual’s own pattern of emotional connection that starts in early childhood with their main
caregivers and persists throughout their life. According to new studies, our early relationships affect our internal models of how to
handle emotions and interact with others as adults. Security, anxiety, avoidance, and fear are the four primary attachment styles
recognized by current research (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2019). Each style is associated with a unique pattern of emotion regulation,
interpersonal functioning, and self-concept. Secure attachment, which forms when caregivers are kind and supportive, fosters a
robust internal functioning model characterized by trust, self-worth, and emotional resilience.
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRA)
Care that is emotionally distant encourages avoidant attachment traits like independence, suppressed emotions, and a lack of
comfort in close relationships, whereas inconsistent care leads to anxious attachment traits like increased emotional sensitivity and a
fear of being abandoned (Karreman & Vingerhoets, 2019).
In the last 10 years, empirical research has progressively associated attachment patterns with wider psychological effects, showing
that attachment is fundamental not just in relationships but also in meaning-making, identity formation, and existential views.
Studies demonstrate that persons with safe attachments possess enhanced self-awareness, a heightened sense of purpose, and more
cohesive worldviews, all of which contribute to psychological stability (Jankowski & Sandage, 2020; Martin et al., 2023). Insecure
attachment, specifically anxious and avoidant styles, correlates with emotional dysregulation, fear-driven cognition, and
susceptibility to existential anxiety, rendering these individuals more sensitive to uncertainty, meaninglessness, and isolation
(Piispanen, 2020).
Individual differences in attachment style also affect how people process and deal with existential crises and other forms of stress.
Hyper activating emotional techniques like ruminating, reassurance-seeking, or catastrophizing are common among adults with
anxious attachment, and they also have a tendency to overestimate the danger that they perceive (Lemay et al., 2023). Denial,
emotional need suppression, and social distance are all deactivation tactics that avoidantly attached people use, even while they’re
experiencing existential crises. (Gillath & Karantzas, 2019) In addition to limiting one’s capacity to absorb difficult life events, these
behaviors often impede healthy meaning-making processes. On the other hand, those who have a secure attachment style are better
able to deal with existential crises by being emotionally open, thinking reflectively, and surrounding themselves with supportive
connections (Hill, C., 2023).
Recent study underscores that attachment style significantly influences people’ introspective capability, tolerance for uncertainty,
and proficiency in managing life changes, all of which are essential elements of existential functioning (Vos, 2023). Consequently,
attachment theory provides a significant framework for comprehending varied reactions to existential crises and establishes a basis
for examining the interplay between coping mechanisms and attachment-related vulnerabilities and strengths. Consequently,
attachment patterns not only influence interpersonal conduct but also significantly mold the psychological frameworks persons use
to confront existential issues.
1) Emotional stability, a solid sense of self, and harmonious relationships are all benefits of secure attachment.
2) A person with anxious attachment tends to be more reliant on other people, emotionally hyperactive, and afraid of rejection.
3) Difficulty establishing deep ties, emotional distance, and dependence on one’s own resources are symptoms of avoidant
attachment disorder.
4) Relational patterns are unstable and conflicted in people with fearful attachment, which is characterized by a combination of
anxiety and avoidance.
5) A person’s capacity to manage stress, ambiguity, and existential crises is significantly impacted by their attachment type.
6) Patterns of caring in early infancy affect the emotional functioning of adults via the formation of internal working models.
IV. COPING STRATEGIES
Coping mechanisms are the strategies and behaviors used to manage stressful events, whether they are internal or external. (Biggs et
al., 2021) It encompasses a wide array of strategies, including confronting issues directly, seeking external support, regulating
emotions, and cultivating an optimistic outlook. Coping is a complex notion that emerges at several levels, including behavioral,
cognitive, emotional, and attitudinal.
In order to get beyond obstacles and disappointments, this complicated procedure requires the use of a wide variety of methods that
have been strategically laid out. In order to cope with the complexities of life and respond to a broad range of situations, individuals
use a vast range of methods and tactics. Through the use of these dynamic coping mechanisms, individuals strive to preserve a
profound feeling of satisfaction and overall well-being throughout their journey in life.
In order to manage stress, individuals usually make use of coping strategies that are centered on emotions as well as those that are
centered on problems. Problem-focused coping, which involves attempting to modify or eliminate the cause of stress, is effective
when you have some level of control over the stressful situation. On the other hand, emotion-focused coping becomes very
important in situations in which it is not possible to completely avoid stress, especially when the sources of stress are beyond your
control. (Compas et al.,2022) By using this assortment of methods, you have the ability to alter the manner in which you react to the
tension that you encounter in these types of situations. People also use a variety of maladaptive coping mechanisms in response to
stressors, including but not limited to substance abuse, angry outbursts, denial or avoidance of the issue at hand, self-injury, and
binge eating.
The term „coping mechanism“ refers to „any conscious or unconscious modification or adaptation that reduces tension and anxiety
in the course of an event or situation that is challenging.“ (APA Dictionary of Psychology, no date-b) This refers to any
modifications that individuals make, whether consciously or subconsciously, with the purpose of reducing stress and anxiety that
they experience when placed in difficult circumstances. These changes, which might be of a behavioral or mental character, result in
a reduction of the negative consequences that the stressor has on the individual’s mental and physical health.
According to a different point of view, „Coping mechanisms are cognitive and behavioral approaches that we use to manage internal
and external stressors“ implies The mental and behavioral skills that we use in order to handle pressures and difficulties, regardless
of whether they originate from external or internal sources, are referred to as coping strategies. Navigating through difficult
situations and maintaining emotional stability are made easier by the use of these coping mechanisms. In addition to that, „Coping“
is defined as „the conscious strategies that are employed to alleviate distressing feelings.“ Coping methods might be societal or
individual, as well as mental or behavioral in nature. „The capacity to navigate through and overcome life’s challenges is what is
referred to as coping.“ By engaging in this activity, individuals are able to maintain their emotional and mental well-being.
In this study, we continued to define the notion of coping in the following way: „Proactive coping is the term used to describe the
cognitive and behavioral efforts that are made in order to anticipate, prevent, or modify potential stressors before they occur.“ It is a
coping strategy that takes a future-oriented perspective and places emphasis on achieving goals via self-regulation as well as
managing one’s own quality of life. The characteristics of proactive coping include ingenuity, responsibility, and vision, and it
entails a combination of preparation, positive reframing, and acceptance. „It is differentiated from other forms of coping by the way
that it incorporates and utilizes social and non-social resources, employs visions of success, and employs positive emotional
strategies.“ (Greenglass and colleagues, 2019)
Individuals who are going through an existential crisis often look back on their life and offer challenging questions about their
purpose and what it is that they are meant to accomplish. When dealing with the instability and uncertainty that occurs during
moments of introspection, it is crucial to have coping mechanisms in place. The manner in which individuals cope with an
existential crisis may have a substantial impact on their psychological well-being and their ability to discover meaning in the face of
existential challenges. The understanding of the relationship between coping strategies and existential crises may lead to the
development of resilience and self-improvement when confronted with the uncertainty of existence. In order to get a greater
understanding of the ways in which individuals cope with their experiences of existential crises, we need examine a wider range of
literature that throws light on the coping mechanisms that people use.
V. ATTACHMENT EXISTENTIAL COPING LINK
The most recent findings indicate that attachment patterns have a role in the way that individuals understand existential problems,
and they also have a significant impact on the methods that people use to manage uncertainty during times of ambiguity. Having a
secure connection allows people to have a feeling of security, trust, and emotional anchoring inside themselves. This enables them
to face existential problems such as purpose, identity, and death without experiencing undue worry (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2019).
On the other hand, insecure attachment styles, including anxious and avoidant orientations, exacerbate sensitivity to existential risks,
which often results in increased emotional instability and maladaptive coping strategies (Piispanen, 2020).
Individuals with anxious attachment often exhibit increased sensitivity to existential ambiguity due to their ongoing worries of
abandonment, poor self-assessments, and need for external validation. This emotional hyperactivation renders individuals more
susceptible to ruminating, catastrophizing, and emotional overload when faced with existential themes such as meaninglessness or
loss of life direction (Martin et al., 2023). Avoidantly attached persons often conceal existential anxieties, use emotional
detachment, and utilize deactivate coping mechanisms such as denial or avoidance. While avoidance may provide temporary respite,
it often leads to profound existential solitude and unresolved internal turmoil (Lemay et al., 2023).
Coping techniques act as the intermediary that links attachment orientation to existential consequences. Research conducted over the
last decade indicates that secure attachment is significantly correlated with adaptive coping mechanisms, including meaning-
making, reflective thinking, and social support, which assist people in establishing coherence and purpose amid existential inquiries
(Park et al., 2023). Insecure people often use maladaptive coping mechanisms such as repression, detachment, emotional
disengagement, and drug use, which exacerbate existential anxiety and extend the cycle of misery (Chen et al., 2024). These
distinctions indicate that attachment type not only affects emotional responses but also directly determines the methods people
choose to manage existential unease.
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRA)
A distinct „attachment → coping → existential outcome“ paradigm is shown by the interaction of these factors. One way in which
people with solid attachments deal with existential dread is by developing coping mechanisms that allow them to incorporate
uncertainty into who they are and how they see the world. On the other hand, issues with anxious or avoidant attachment may lead
to a breakdown in meaning systems and impaired abilities to manage stress, which in turn can amplify and prolong existential crises.
Whether people see existential crises as opportunities for personal development or crippling psychological dangers is ultimately
determined by their ingrained relationship patterns, as shown by the attachment existential coping connection.
1) Secure connection forecasts effective coping, which alleviates existential angst and enhances the perception of purpose in life.
2) Anxious connection amplifies existential sensitivity, resulting in rumination, emotional hyperactivation, and fear-based coping
mechanisms.
3) Avoidant connection fosters emotional repression, heightening existential solitude and obstructing the process of meaning-
making.
4) Coping methods serve as intermediaries between attachment style and consequences of existential suffering.
5) Insecure attachment heightens dependence on maladaptive coping mechanisms, including avoidance, denial, and emotional
withdrawal.
6) Individuals with secure attachment have enhanced meaning-making abilities, facilitating the appropriate processing of
existential issues.
7) The triadic model delineates a distinct trajectory: Attachment influences coping mechanisms, which in turn affects existential
well-being, elucidating the rationale for attachment’s predictive capacity regarding the intensity of existential crises.
VI. VALUE SYSTEMS AND THEIR ROLE IN EXISTENTIAL MEANING
Value systems have a crucial role in shaping how people interpret life’s experiences, find purpose, and deal with existential
concerns. Values help people create a unified sense of identity and purpose, guide decisions, and define life goals. When faced with
existential uncertainty, those who have consistent and cohesive beliefs are better able to stay on course and remain emotionally
resilient. According to research, value clarity protects against ambiguity and existential meaninglessness and improves
psychological stability (Schnell, 2020; Vos, 2023). On the other hand, value ambiguity or conflict often makes existential distress
worse and creates a sense of purposelessness, especially in young individuals going through developmental transitions.
Value systems are shaped and maintained throughout a person’s life by their attachment style. Values held by people who
experience secure attachment tend to be firmly grounded in consistency, trust, and emotional steadiness. (Jankowski and Sandage,
2020), following these principles may help one become more self-aware, develop healthier coping methods, and find a greater
meaning in life. On the other side, value systems may become fragmented or impacted by outside forces when there is insecure
connection, especially when it comes to anxious and avoidant tendencies. People are more likely to experience existential pain due
to this instability since their beliefs and ambitions are more likely to be challenged by emotional turbulence or external influences
(Martin et al., 2023). Coping strategies are inextricably linked to one’s own values. Acceptance, mindfulness, and positive reframing
are examples of adaptive coping techniques that people are more likely to use if they cultivate intrinsic values, which include
compassion, connection, and personal growth (Greenglass & Fiksenbaum, 2019). The process of constructing meaning is enhanced,
and resilience is strengthened in the face of existential challenges by these strategies. People who have unclear or externally driven
values may be more likely to rely on maladaptive coping methods, such as avoidance, denial, or emotional suppression. These
coping techniques may worsen existential stress and have a detrimental impact on an individual’s psychological well-being (Lemay
et al., 2023). A psychological underpinning that is known as value systems integrates attachment, coping strategies, and existential
functioning. The improvement of one’s own principles and beliefs assists individuals in the creation of meaning, the development of
emotional control, and the resolution of existential issues with more stability. According to the most recent studies, the development
of a coherent value system may help to cultivate a sense of purpose, promote healthy coping strategies, and provide protection
against the emotional confusion that is connected to existential crises (Schnell, 2020; Vos, 2023).
VII. IMPLICATIONS & FUTURE DIRECTIONS
There are important implications for mental health policy, preventative initiatives, and psychological practice when we understand
the connection between attachment types, existential crises, and coping mechanisms. According to recent studies (Jankowski &
Sandage, 2020; Mikulincer & Shaver, 2019), fostering stable attachment in children or adults via therapeutic settings improves their
ability to regulate their emotions, makes them better at making sense of the world, and makes them less likely to experience
existential dread.
Interventions that target the improvement of relational security, such interpersonal methods, attachment-based therapy, and emotion-
focused therapy, might potentially be very helpful in protecting persons from existential suffering. For the purpose of alleviating
existential feelings of isolation, it is crucial to promote good interpersonal situations and strengthen social ties, especially among
young individuals who are more vulnerable throughout their formative years.
Incorporating existential ideas into therapeutic models has also been beneficial in treating the emotional and cognitive aspects of
existential crises. Interventions including Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), Meaning-Centered Therapy (MCT), and
Existential Therapy (ECT) help people overcome their fears of the unknown by guiding them to reflect on their beliefs, face their
uncertainties, and develop the ability to be psychologically flexible. These therapy techniques aid clients who struggle with insecure
attachment in rebuilding their internal working models, integrating their unresolved concerns, and developing better ways of coping.
In addition, research has shown that self-compassion training and mindfulness-based techniques may help people deal with
existential distress more effectively and with less reliance on unhealthy coping mechanisms.
Incorporating psychoeducation on coping skills, meaning-making, and attachment awareness into counseling centers, community
mental-health programs, and colleges is a feasible recommendation. Especially in online spaces, young people often express
significant levels of existential stress associated with coming into their own, scholastic pressure, and comparing themselves to
others. Individuals may learn healthy coping mechanisms and have their existential worries validated via peer-based therapies,
support groups, and structured seminars. There has been encouraging evidence that programs emphasizing introspective practices,
emotional literacy, and proactive coping may alleviate existential suffering and improve general well-being.
The attachment-existential-coping relationship should be further investigated in future studies to see if there are developmental,
cultural, or technological differences. The majority of the research on existential crisis comes from the West, which means we don’t
fully grasp the impact of collectivist societies, interdependent identities, and family-centered value systems. In addition, there is a
need for greater research into the ways in which digital-era difficulties like online isolation, virtual identity, and social media-driven
comparison have impacted contemporary existential worries. To further understand how attachment type affects coping strategies
and existential resilience during development, longitudinal research is necessary. More thorough, culturally appropriate, and
developmentally informed intervention models may be the result of future research that fills these gaps.
In order to help people who are going through existential crisis, this section mainly focuses on three main points: building safe
relationships, improving adaptive coping skills, and encouraging the process of making sense of things. A strong basis for
intervention and prevention is built by integrating attachment theory, existential psychology, and coping frameworks; this
guarantees higher psychological resilience in today’s fast-paced, ever-changing cultures.
1) The integration of attachment-based and existential treatments may substantially enhance emotional resilience and diminish
existential distress.
2) Improving meaning-making abilities via therapies such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy or Meaning-Centered Therapy
assists people in reconstructing purpose amid existential suffering.
3) Establishing safe connection patterns in maturity might mitigate maladaptive coping mechanisms and diminish psychological
vulnerability.
4) Fostering social connectivity is crucial to mitigate existential loneliness, particularly in young people.
5) Preliminary psychoeducational initiatives focused on coping and emotional control may avert enduring existential challenges.
6) Future study should investigate digital-era stresses, like online comparison and virtual solitude, that exacerbate existential
anxieties.
VIII. CONCLUSION
This review shows how coping mechanisms, attachment patterns, and existential crises create a complex psychological framework
that influences how people react to emotional stress, ambiguity, and meaninglessness. Secure connection lessens the intensity of
existential anxiety by promoting emotional stability, enhancing the ability to create meaning, and promoting adaptive coping. On the
other hand, insecure attachment, especially anxious and avoidant types, weakens tolerance for uncertainty and leads to maladaptive
coping, which increases vulnerability. Promising avenues to improve psychological resilience include emerging treatments like
ACT, meaning-centered methods, and attachment-based therapies. To fully comprehend the effects of cultural, developmental, and
digital-age factors on the attachment-existential-coping connection, further study is necessary. All things considered, improving
meaning-making processes, encouraging adaptive coping, and fortifying emotional ties continue to be crucial tactics for helping
people in modern society who are struggling with existential issues.
REFERENCES
[1] Biggs, A., Brough, P., & Drummond, S. (2021). Lazarus and Folkman’s psychological stress and coping theory. The handbook of stress and health: A guide to
research and practice, 349-364.
[2] Chen, S., Cheung, M. W., & Cheng, C. (2024). Flexibility in coping deployment and psychological adjustment during COVID-19: A three-level meta-analysis
across 33 countries. Social Science & Medicine.
[3] Compas, B. E., Jaser, S. S., Bettis, A. H., Watson, K. H., Gruhn, M. A., Dunbar, J. P., … & Thigpen, J. C. (2022). Coping, emotion regulation, and
psychopathology in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological bulletin, 143(9), 939.
[4] Gillath, O., & Karantzas, G. (2019). Attachment security priming: A systematic review. Current opinion in psychology, 25, 86-95.
[5] Greenglass, E. R., & Fiksenbaum, L. (2019). Proactive coping, positive affect, and well-being: Testing for mediation using path analysis. European
psychologist, 14(1), 29-39.
[6] Hill, C. (2023). Self-compassion and attachment styles: a meta-analysis, and an empirical study of a self-compassion intervention for people living with a skin
condition (Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff University).
[7] Karreman, A., & Vingerhoets, A. J. (2019). Attachment and well-being: The mediating role of emotion regulation and resilience. Personality and Individual
differences, 53(7), 821-826.
[8] Lemay Jr, E. P., Kruglanski, A. W., Molinario, E., Agostini, M., Bélanger, J. J., Gützkow, B., … & Leander, N. P. (2023). The role of values in coping with
health and economic threats of COVID-19. The Journal of Social Psychology, 163(6), 755-772.
[9] Martin, A., Helm, P., & Chen, S. (2023). Attachment insecurity and existential isolation. Personality and Individual Differences, 205, 112028.
[10] Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2019). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Publications.
[11] Park, C. L., Wilt, J. A., Russell, B. S., & Fendrich, M. (2023). Does perceived post-traumatic growth during the COVID-19 pandemic reflect actual positive
changes? Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 36(6), 661-673.
[12] Piispanen, M. (2020). Behavioral and physiological correlates of empathy and empathic accuracy in human-centered design.
[13] Schnell, T. (2020). The psychology of meaning in life. Review of General Psychology, 24(1), 3–15.
[14] Steger, M. F. (2017). Meaning in life and wellbeing. Wellbeing, recovery and mental health, 7, 75-85.
[15] van Bruggen, V., Ten Klooster, P., Westerhof, G., Vos, J., de Kleine, E., Bohlmeijer, E., & Glas, G. (2017). The Existential Concerns Questionnaire (ECQ)–
development and initial validation of a new existential anxiety scale in a nonclinical and clinical sample. Journal of clinical psychology, 73(12), 1692-1703.
[16] Vos, J. (2023). The meaning sextet: A systematic literature review and further validation of a universal typology of meaning in life. Journal of Constructivist
Psychology, 36(2), 204-231.
